
In an obviously misguided attempt at mocking the playoff structure of the NCAA tournament, we’re inviting readers to enjoy matchups of actual fetishes in a voter-powered tournament, culminating in April with the Nasty Fetish Final Four. That tournament continues today with Round One action. Remember, you’re voting for what you consider the more nasty fetish.
1. Formicophilia
Literal Meaning: “This is deriving sexual pleasure from insects crawling on the body, specifically on the genitals. It is more common in developing countries, perhaps because homes are infested with insects. This could lead to an individual’s genitals being exposed to insects (especially if they have outdoor bathrooms, as many developing countries do), and if this happens at a young age when they are sexually developing, they may derive pleasure from it.”
The Intarwebs say: Hop onto the Love Bug scene.
Notable Advocates: Lamar Odom, Chris Klein, Leah Remini
9. Vore
Literal Meaning: “This is arousal by the thought of being eaten by someone, eating someone else, or watching someone eat somebody else. It is called “vore” for short. Perhaps this is related to cannibalism, but how someone develops a fetish like this, I really could not even speculate upon. It involves pure fantasy (at least hopefully it does), since it would be very difficult to make any of the aforementioned situations reality.”
The Intarwebs say: “Yeah, a mixed blessing. On the one hand, vore being unknown can make us feel isolated and “in hiding”. But on the other hand, if there was a public opinion on vore, would that really be an improvement? It would probably be a negative opinion, placing us in the same category as necrophiles and zoophiles. Think about Furrydom’s current status in the public eye: “people who have orgies dressed up like cartoons”. And look at the treatment vore has recieved on the internet, such as from SA, which make vore sound like something you need a lobotomy to enjoy. Personally, I prefer ‘huh, vore, what is that?’ to ‘vore!? wtf is wrong with you?’ Perhaps some day in the future, being a vorarephile will not carry any social stigma among non-vores. But reaching that point will be an uphill battle.”
Notable Advocates: Torry Holt, Ben Savage, Henry Rollins


Testujemy aplikacje
Interesting, really great ideas for my work
I hope this site helps :)
Hello i am The Photographer for th The wedding photography in greece.
I have to thank you for the fantastic work for items that you write.
I am a regular reader of your site and always tell friends to visit your thousand. Once again thanks:) http://photographer-greece.com
UPSET?!
Yeah, Rosario Dawson could definitely take a bite. I’m thinking chest and upper arm, though. No sausage.
Conceptually, I think the bug thing is more removed from any actual sensuality. There’s lots of chicks that like to bite. I think some of them would like to take a chunk if you let ‘em. Bugs, on the other hand, have not shit to do with sex or being with another person.
but in practice, vore is some sick ass shit. I haven’t looked at the bracket: is there a vore/stoma matchup in the final four?
Think Ill check back with KSK after the NCAA tournament perhaps this stupid fetish shit will be done by then.
If that pic is Rosario Dawson I am going to be pissed you guys ruined her for me. Now I will associate her images with vore. Wait, that’s hot.
I think it’s so close because formicophilia is totally doable and not “purely fantasy” like vore is (and should remain). Frankly the idea of bugs near any hole of mine, particularly one so… special, sways me to vote formicophilia.
The Internet makes you stupid…
“You’re all sick fucks.”
That’s MR. Sick Fuck to you, miss. And I still voted for vore as nastier.
Urgh, I thought the formicophilia was a sure thing!
http://populationpaste.com/blog/2006/08/16/love-bugs/
http://populationpaste.com/img/2006/08/bugbites/centipenis.mov
At least when the giantess is eating you, it goes pretty quickly.
VORE….huh! What is it good for? Absolutely nothin’, say it again…
jeffrey fucking dahmer people!!! not hannibal lecter, real fucking people!!!
I’ve chosen to redefine vore as eating someone (preferably a lady with no herp) without actually chewing and swallowing. So there’s the rationale for my vote.
/ROWR
@Rikadyn
Did you type that with the arm you have left?
I knew a chick once that was into vore…she was fucking hot, so it never bothered me…
An uphill battle? Fuck, I thought NAMBLA was delusional. These insane fuckers put those kid touchers to crazy shame.
As morally repugnant as cannibalism is, I’ve gotta go with Formicophilia–it actually deals with the literal practice of letting bugs crawl around on your package, while it seems like vore operates in the more abstract territory of ‘fantasy’. Besides, cannibalism is difficult to relate to and tough to imagine in a sense memory capacity, like string theory or the history of the Boer war. Bugs on the other hand, have a much more immediate, tangible “ick” factor.
From the vore-related thread linked above:
But there is good news. We have the internet! Even if voraphiles can’t be accepted, they can congregate faster than ever before. REJOICE, REJOICE YOU HUNGRY BASTARDS =D
Fuck the Internet.
Ugh.
wow, tracer.
I actually can’t believe how close this is.
One involves insects. The other involves CANNIBALISM, WHICH NECESSITATES THE MURDER AND INGESTION OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING.
You know who did that shit?
Jeffrey Dahmer.
You’re all sick fucks.
I’m generally opposed to shame, but vorephiles should feel deep, deep shame. Deep, burning, shit yourself in front of your 7th grade classmates, explaining to your mother and your priest that you jerk off to eating people like some kind of goddamn zombie pervert shame.
@85
I’m with you… I don’t like thinking that “hungry eyes” can have two meanings…….
But Torry Holt might be coming to play for the Jags. NOOOOOOOOOOOO!
/maybe he’ll eat Garrard
Generally insects won’t bite your weiner off. Chicks that get off to eating human flesh however, may.
“Personally, I prefer ‘huh, vore, what is that?’ to ‘vore!? wtf is wrong with you?’”
Then today is not your day buddy. What the fuck is wrong with you?
I’m calling the upset… can this even be an upset?
Perhaps some day in the future, being a vorarephile will not carry any social stigma among non-vores.
As long as you get off on wanting to be eaten, no dice.
@make it snow
Because of “eats guy standing next to you” fetish. Come on. We’ve all had insects on us, if you get you’re jollies to it, no biggie. If you cream your pants over Hannibal Lecter shit, that’s fucked up.
Even if it meant rubbing a few worms around, I’d still bang Leah Remini during her skinny phase on King of Queens.
Oh, and boo cannibalism.
Um, how the fuck is ants-in-the-pants losing?
Sure, eating people is disgusting, but is it more disgusting if done for sexual gratification? I vote “no”.
+1 for bugs.
Mmm, I love me some roast baby duck, er, I mean Mamacita.