
In an obviously misguided attempt at mocking the playoff structure of the NCAA tournament, we’re inviting readers to enjoy matchups of actual fetishes in a voter-powered tournament, culminating in April with the Nasty Fetish Final Four. That tournament continues today with Round One action. Remember, you’re voting for what you consider the more nasty fetish.
6. Macrophilia
Literal Meaning: “A sexual fantasy involving domination by giants, primarily giant women. Variants include metamorphic fantasies; the shrinking of men/women so that average-sized people appear relatively huge, or more commonly, ordinary humans growing to giant size.”
What the Intarwebs Say: “When I was very young, barely into elementary school and maybe even before, I noticed something rather curious. Whenever I viewed a gigantic being of some sort on the television, in a movie, or anywhere else, I would become sexually aroused. One of my very first memories of this was the movie King Kong. As soon as I saw the enormous ape clutch Fay Wray in his hand, I was instantly mesmerized. I was too young to have much understanding of these feelings; I just felt them and didn’t ask questions. Like many young boys, I was and still am fascinated with dinosaurs, being completely awestruck by the power of these grand, majestic juggernauts.”
Notable Advocates: Patton Oswalt (no, really), Matt Forte, Delroy Lindo
11. Bondage
Literal Meaning: “In the context of BDSM, bondage involves people being tied up or otherwise restrained for pleasure. Bondage is usually, but not always, a sexual practice. The paraphilia of being sexually aroused by bondage is sometimes known as vincilagnia (from Latin vincio, to bind or fetter with chains, and lagneia, lust).”
The Intarwebs Say: Well, they bitch about Watchmen too.
Notable Advocates: Julianne Moore, Jay Bilas, Aaron McGruder


I hate that B&D and S&M are always lumped together as “BDSM”… there’s a definite distinction between bondage and S&M, both in practice and in the kind of relationship partners who engage in them have with one another. Bondage is pretty PG-13 as far as I’m concerned.
Wanting to be stomped by a giant lady is just fucking weird.
Nothing wrong with a little Snoo Snoo.
I hate that B&D and S&M are always lumped together as “BDSM”
That’s because it’s a “smart” way to put THREE (not two) fetishes into one.
It stands for
Bondage & Discipline
Dominance & Submission
Sadism & Masochism
Of the three, the Dominance & Submission one is definitely the most fun. In my book anyways. Bondage is okay, not really all that great. Telling a girl she can’t move is much more fun. Discipline is always enjoyable if the girl is into it, but again, I’ve yet to meet a girl who didn’t get out of her mind horny from a good spanking.
Sadism & Masochism is not for me.
If you’re an epileptic, stay away from the giantess. Epileptics tend to “disappear” when she’s in the mood.
The other day I was in the cafeteria line beside a girl who was easily 6’7” and my only thought was “looooong legs.” Macro sounds like regular sex with a tall girl. I can get with that.
As for bondage…it’s common, but probably nastier. So it wins by default.
There’s Waldo!
No mention of Steve Rushon in the macrophilia notables? He’s Mr. Rebecca Lobo!
I voted bondage based on prevalence. Or at least based on its prevalence online. However, creepiness weighs heavier than prevalence for me so if it was Bondage vs. Empty Skull Fucking, that’s a no-brainer. ZING!
If you haven’t seen Tinkerbell recently, Disney has made her into a sexbomb. They’ve always got her posed with her big, round ass facing me and this smoldering, come-hither, over-the-shoulder look. I . . . I want to fuck Tinkerbell so hard.
I’m going to hell for this, aren’t I?
Nothing wrong with a little bondage. I’m going to have to agree with John that the “King Kong” erection made my decision. Not to mention the simple physical impossibility of it.
Of course, I did have a thing for Tinkerbell as a kid. So confused…
yeah, there’s this seven-footer around here that looks like Herman Munster in a really bad wig. that don’t help any.
but I thought we were talking about ‘Walk-In Vagina’ tall, not just Lisa Leslie tall.
nothing wrong with being into tall chicks. What I’d really like to get worked out is this big-little fantasy. I’ve never been with a big (like over six-foot 200#) and a little (like 5’2″ and under) chick at the same time. too many geometrical proofs that need to be put into practice…
Tough choice, but I’m gonna vote for bondage. Unless we’re talking about world’s tallest woman, tall. The kind of chick who looks like Georghe Muresan.
The mind is willing, but the body is spongy and bruised
if nobody’s bleeding, then you’re really just playing kid’s games
as for my vote; meh. the dude that gets wood watching King Kong probably tipped it for me
Nothing too intense about either one. Tall chicks need loving too so I’ll go with Bondage here as well.
These are some fairly tame choices unless Giantess explicitly includes crushing, which I have to assume it doesn’t as there’s a separate entry for crush porn. I guess BDSM is “nastier” considering that S&M can go into some pretty dark places and I dig tall women.
I agree with FMRA on the BD-BDSM distinction. There are so many wanna be post-modern feminists on Adultfriendfinder and Match.com who’ll giggle and tell you how they’re edgy and into BDSM when they really mean “you can tie my hands behind my back loosely with silk scarfs while you kiss me and gently touch my bosoms.”
If you aren’t into handprints on the ass, then don’t fucking say you’re into BDSM.
i’m pretty sure we’re not talking ‘very tall human sized person’ but ‘attack of the 50-foot woman’ size here. that to me is a little *weirder* than getting tied. But not nastier, it’s still a person-shaped object after all, not say, a dead dog or a tepid carton of lo mein or something.
Either way, how did either of these not end up in the 13-16 range? I just don’t see either of these fairing well in later rounds.
I hate that B&D and S&M are always lumped together as “BDSM”… there’s a definite distinction between bondage and S&M, both in practice and in the kind of relationship partners who engage in them have with one another. Bondage is pretty PG-13 as far as I’m concerned.
Wanting to be stomped by a giant lady is just fucking weird.
Cloverfield would have been better with that hot bitch in it.
Because Zed’s dead, baby. Zed’s dead.
The Gimp demands to know why he wasn’t listed as an advocate? Zed too!
I do not feel that there is anything wrong with either choice. I like to tie up amazon women with leather straps and ball gags. That does not make me a bad person, it makes me human.
Some of those chicks in the WNBA are smokin’ hot so I’ll reluctantly go with Bondage as the nastier fetish. Although any woman who has something against ball gags and leather wrist cuffs has some pretty deep seated daddy issues she needs to work out.
If it’s good enough for Delroy Lindo, it’s good enough for me.
Nothing to nasty about either, unless you’re tapping a 400 lb bitch.
Whichever the winner is here-they are gone in the second round…